I believe that religion is about being serious about the choices you make about who you want to be and how you want to live your life. Not the "spooky stuff".
Compassion is like that. You are free not to be compassionate and that's the choice that most people make most of the time. Choosing compassion as the guiding principal of your life is a huge leap of faith. There is no particular reason to share in the suffering of others. In fact, Buddhism itself teaches that such sharing will lead directly to personal suffering. Compassion is often costly, painful and difficult.
![]() |
| Tragic end of 4-Year Old Alan Kurdi's flight from terror |
Many contributors to the debate point out that the refugee crisis is, in some way, "our fault". Whether this is true or not, the assumption is that we should act if and only if we have an obligation to pay for our prior sins. Compassion is a burden, a cost, not a way to be the best we can be. That's not compassion. That's Karma-lite.
There is no connection between us and that little boy except the fact that we are all in this together. No human being would turn away that child if they found him alive on their doorstep. At what point do we decide to turn our backs on our better nature and decide that the honour of helping will belong to someone else?


No comments:
Post a Comment